1 A.B.A. No. 5789 of 2025 2025:JHHC:30351 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5789 of 2025 ---- 1.Dr.Ranjeet @ Ranjeet Kumar, aged about 44 years, son of Ramanandan Prasad resident of Village Bhaisasur, Sundargarh PO and PS Bihar Sharif District Bihar Sharif, Bihar 2.Dr.Ali @ Ali Hasan, aged about 31 years son of Barkat Ali Ansari, resident of Mahuda Basti PO and PS Mahuda District Dhanbad, Jharkhand 3.Dr. Sachin @ Sachin Kumar Gupta, aged about 43 years son of Ramanandan Prasad, resident of Bhaisasur, Sundargarh, PO and PS Bihar Sharif, District Bihar Sharif, Bihar .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. R.R. Tiwari, Advocate For the State :- Mrs Vandana Bharti, Advocate ---- 2/26.09.2025 Heard learned counsels for petitioners and for State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Hazaribag Mufassil PS Case No.89 of 2025, for offence registered under section 105/3(5) of BNS, 2023, pending in court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh. 3. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that there are three petitioners who are Dental Doctors. He further submits that the informant has brought his son in the hospital of these doctors for injury received in his jaw and medical advice was given and surgery was also suggested. He then submits that on the day of surgery his son was not in normal condition and in view of that, these doctors have suggested for treatment and thereafter only the surgery can be made and thereafter the informant has taken away his son to another hospital where he died. He submits that in this background only the FIR has been registered and 2 A.B.A. No. 5789 of 2025 even the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Jackob Mathew v. State of Punjab reported in (2005) 6 SCC 1 has not been considered. 4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer however he is not denying that the petitioners are the Dental Doctors in light of the FIR. 5. Considering that petitioners are Dental Doctors and they have suggested treatment first and then to do surgery for that and the informant has taken away his son to another hospital where informant’s son died. There are guidelines by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioners. 6. Accordingly, petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before learned court within three weeks from today, and in event of their surrender/arrest, petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh, in connection with Hazaribag Mufassil PS Case No.89 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 26th Sept., 2025 SI/