Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:39913
Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7883 of 2025 Applicant :- Anshul Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Virendra Singh Tomar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Anurag Singh Yadav,G.A.,Suraj Kumar Singh Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today on behalf of the applicant is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the informant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
3. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant Anshul Kumar with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.371 of 2024, under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., P.S. Nai Mandi, District Muzaffarnagar during pendency of the trial.
4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Named accused person persuaded the informant that company provided job to many persons. Informant then deposit Rs.3,50,000/- in the account of co-accused Deepti Rana. Applicant having no concern with the alleged incident. Applicant being husband of co-accused Deepti Rani, has been implicated in the present case. Applicant has not received any amount. There is no prospect of trial of the present case being concluded in near future due to heavy dockets. The applicant is not a previous convict. The applicant is languishing in jail since 10.12.2024 and in case he is enlarged on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
5. Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the bail prayer of the applicant. Learned counsel for the informant submitted that Rs.3,30,000/- has been deposited in the account of applicant.
6. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case,
submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without
expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant, Anshul Kumar, who is involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. i. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 19.3.2025 SKD Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad