Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26315 (BOM)

PARMESHWAR YASHWANTRAO TILAK v. PAWAN DASHRATH MANGULKAR AND ANR

CA/11743/2024 · 2025-04-15

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 138-ca-11743-2024-delay.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11743 OF 2024 IN FAST/23213/2024 PARMESHWAR YASHWANTRAO TILAK VERSUS PAWAN DASHRATH MANGULKAR AND ANR ... Mr. Surendra V. Suryawanshi, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. V. R. Mundada, Advocate for Respondent No.2. ... CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATED : 15th APRIL, 2025. P.C.:- 1. Heard learned Advocate appearing for respective parties. 2. By this application, applicant seeks to condone delay of 339 days caused in filing Appeal. 3. Perused application and reasons as stated therein. Sufficient cause is made out to condone delay. Hence, following order: ORDER a. Civil Application is allowed. b. Delay of 339 days caused in filing appeal is hereby condoned. c. Appeal be registered subject to removal of office objections. (S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR) JUDGE Devendra/April-2025 2025:BHC-AUG:10862