Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010249652025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3646/2025 SMT DIPALI TALUKDAR WIFE OF SRI RAM TALUKDAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHALUKDUBI PS AND DIST GOALPARA ASSAM 2: RAM TALUKDAR SON OF LATE SUKHLAL TALUKDAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHALUKDUBI PS AND DIST GOALPARA ASSA VERSUS ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED A CENTRAL GOVT UNDERTAKING HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI GS ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI PIN 781007 REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGER GUWAHATI REGIONAL OFFICE ULUBARI GUWAHATI ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS R SAHA, Advocate for the Respondent : MS. R D MOZUMDAR, Linked Case : MACApp./569/2017 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. A CENTRAL GOVT. UNDERTAKING HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI G.S. ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI 781007 REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGER GAUHATI REGIONAL OFFICE ULUBARI GUWAHATI 781007 Page No.# 2/3 VERSUS ON THE DEATH OF RAKESH TALUKDAR HIS LEGAL HEIRS- S/O SRI RAM TALUKDAR VILL. BHALUKDUBI P.S. GOALPARA DIST. GOALPARA ASSAM. 1.1:DIPALI TALUKDAR AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS W/O RAM TALUKDAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHALUKDUBI P- S. GOALPARA DIST.GOALPARA ASSAM 1.2:RAM TALUKDAR AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS S/O- LATE SUKHLAL TALUKDAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-BHALUKDUBI P.S.- GOALPARA DIST. GOALPARA ASSAM 2:MD. FUL CHAND ALI S/O MOKSHED ALI VILL. JHUNKAIPARA P.O. SIMLABARI P.S. BAGUN DIST. GOALPARA ASSAM. 3:MD. HARUN RASHID S/O ABDUL KARIM VILL. JHUNKAIPARA P.O. SIMLABARI P.S. BAGUAN DIST. GOALPARA ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MS. S SONOWAL Page No.# 3/3 Advocate for : appearing for ON THE DEATH OF RAKESH TALUKDAR HIS LEGAL HEIRS- BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 26.11.2025 None appears for the applicants on call. Also heard Mrs. R. D. Mozumcdar, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent–Insurance Company. Under the given circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that instead of allowing the prayer of the applicants, the respondents should be heard. Therefore, this IA need not be considered. Accordingly, this IA stands dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant