Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26295 (RAJ)

KRISHNA GOPAL @ KISHAN S/O LATE SHRI SITARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/9764/2025 · 2025-09-01

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35008] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9516/2025 Suresh Chand S/o Shri Satyanarayan, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ramnada, Shankarpura, Police Station Phagi, Distt. Jaipur. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined At Sub Jail Sambhar Lake). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9764/2025 Krishna Gopal @ Kishan S/o Late Shri Sitaram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Chindolo Ka Mohalla, Phagi, Police Station Phagi, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined At Sub Jail Sambhar Lake And Is Custody Since 12.07.2025). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijendra Yadav Mr. Karan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 01/09/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 146/2025 registered at Police Station Phagi, District Jaipur Rural for the offences under Sections 8/21 of NDPS Act. [2025:RJ-JP:35008] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9516/2025] 2. Learned counsels for the accused-petitioners submit that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. They further submits that the recovered quantity of contraband articles from the petitioner's possession is below commercial quantity. The accused-petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners and looking to the fact that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Suresh Chand S/o Shri Satyanarayan, 2. Krishna Gopal @ Kishan S/o Late Shri Sitaram, in connection with FIR No. 146/2025 registered at Police Station Phagi, District Jaipur Rural, shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused petitioners are also directed to mark their presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the [2025:RJ-JP:35008] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9516/2025] concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station shall send the presence report of the accused petitioner on the same day to the trial court every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The accused-petitioners are also directed to submit their present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /106-107