Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26287 (RAJ)

SMT LALITA JAIN W/O LT. SH. SATISH CHANDRA JAIN v. KANARAM

CCP/1224/2023 · 2025-02-04

Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Uma Shanker Vyas

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4842-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1224/2023 IN D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.663/2015 Smt Lalita Jain W/o Lt. Sh. Satish Chandra Jain, Aged About 71 Years, R/o 27/60, Jain Colony, Madanganj Kishangarh, District- Ajmer, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Kanaram, Ias, Director, Secondary Education, Samta Nagar, Bikaner, Rajasthan. 2. Shri Nihal Chand Pahadia, Secretary, K.d. Jain Shikshan Parisad, Madanganj-Kishangarh, District- Ajmer (Raj.) And Secretary K.d. Jain Sr. Secondary School, Madanganj Kishangarh, District Ajmer (Raj.) 3. State Of Rajasthan Through Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Secretariat, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anuroop Singhi, Adv., with Mr. Aditya Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG, with Mr. Hardik Singh, Adv. Mr. Ankul Gupta, Adv. HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 04/02/2025 Heard. In the compliance report, it is stated that an amount of Rs.446036/- has been paid. Therefore, we are inclined to close this contempt petition, however, with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate remedy, in case the petitioner is not satisfied with the computation made by the respondents. Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed with aforesaid liberty. Rule is discharged. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ F.R. Bohra & Danish/39