Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010283442025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1369/2025 MOHSIN ALAM SO ABDUL KARIM, RO VILL BORBALI, PS MURAJHAR, PO JOYNAGAR, DIST HOJAI, ASSAM, PIN 782439 2: ABDUL KARIM SO ISAK ALI RO VILL BORBALI PS MURAJHAR PO JOYNAGAR DIST HOJAI ASSAM PIN 782439 3: SOFIR AHMED SO ABDUL HAKIM RO VILL BORHAWAR PS MURAJHAR PO JOYNAGAR DIST HOJAI ASSAM PIN 782439 4: MAFRIN FIRDOUS DO SAFIR AHMED RO VILL BORHAWAR PS MURAJHAR PO JOYNAGAR DIST HOJAI ASSAM PIN 78243 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM Page No.# 2/4 TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Advocate for the Petitioner : TAWHID LASKAR, MR. D K AGARWALA,ASHRAFUL BORBHUYAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : Crl.Pet./1338/2025 MOHSIN ALAM AND 3 ORS. S/O ABDUL KARIM R/O VILL BORBALI PS MURAJHAR PO JOYNAGAR DIST HOJAI ASSAM PIN 782439 2: ABDUL KARIM S/O ISAK ALI R/O VILL BORBALI PS MURAJHAR PO JOYNAGAR DIST HOJAI ASSAM PIN- 782439 3: SOFIR AHMED S/O LT. ABDUL HAKIM R/O VILL BORHAWAR PS MURAJHAR PO JOYNAGAR DIST HOJAI ASSAM 4: MAFRIN FIRDOUS D/O SAFIR AHMED R/O VILL BARHAWAR PS MURAJHAR PO JOYNAGAR DIST HOJAI ASSAM Page No.# 3/4 PIN 782439 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PP ASSAM 2:BIKRAM HORIZON S/O SITAMAN HORIZON R/O VILL OKSEK GAON PS MURAJHAR PO JOYNAGAR DIST HOJAI ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : TAWHID LASKAR Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date : 18.12.2025 1. Heard Mr. S. Choudhury, the learned counsel for the applicants. 2. This Interlocutory Application has been filed by the applicants praying for correction of the typographical error which has crept in the order dated 07.11.2025, passed in connection with Criminal Petition No. 1338/2025. 3. The learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that in Paragraph No. 2 as well as Paragraph No. 10 of the aforesaid order, the year of the Special (POCSO) Case Number has been mentioned as 2014 instead of 2024, and same is required to be rectified. 4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants and have gone through the records. Page No.# 4/4 5. It appears that in Paragraph No. 2 and Paragraph No. 10 of the aforesaid order, the Special (POCSO) Case Number has been mentioned as 18/2014 instead of Special (POCSO) Case No.18/2024. 6. This appears to be due to inadvertent typographical error, which is required to be rectified. 7. Accordingly, this Interlocutory Application is allowed. 8. The Special (POCSO) Case Number mentioned as 18/2014 in paragraph No. 2 and 10 of the order dated 07.11.2025 in Criminal Petition No.1338/2025 shall be read as “Special (POCSO) Case No. 18/2024”. 9. This Interlocutory Application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant