Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26281 (DEL)

HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD v. MAHARAJI EDUCATIONAL TRUST AND ORS

W.P.(C)/11475/2025 · 2025-08-11

Anil Kshetarpal, Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11475/2025 & CM APPL. 47085/2025 (Stay) HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Yoginder Handoo, Mr. Ashwin Kataria & Mr. Aditya Aggarwal, Advs. versus MAHARAJI EDUCATIONAL TRUST AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Singh, Mr. Sunil Dalal & Mr. Sanjeev Kakra, Sr. Advs. with Ms. Deepika Kalia, Mr. A.S. Shera, Mr. Kashish Narang, Mr. Vikram Singh Dalal, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Nikhil Beniwal & Ms. Shipra Bali, Advs. for R-1 to R-3. Ms. Anubha Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Chetan Jadon, GP & Ms. Aditi Sharma, Adv. for R- 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR O R D E R % 11.08.2025 1. The present petition has been instituted under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India to assail the legality of two orders arising from proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal-III, Delhi1 - 1 DRT This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2025 at 12:20:02 namely, the order dated 06.06.2025 passed by the learned Presiding Officer and the order dated 31.07.2025 passed by the learned Recovery Officer. 2. It is admitted that the Appeals against the order dated 06.06.2025 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, DRT-III, are pending before the learned Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi,2 and the same are listed for hearing on 20.08.2025. 3. The Petitioner (Certificate Holder) further prays for issuance of directions to the learned Recovery Officer to defer coercive proceedings until the learned DRAT adjudicates the pending appeals. 4. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submits that the learned DRAT has, at present, merely directed the Petitioner to furnish a revised statement of accounts and has not passed any substantive interim order affecting the proceedings before the Recovery Officer. 5. This Court has considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. At this stage, the Court does not find it appropriate to go into the merits of the case, particularly when the appeals before the learned DRAT are scheduled for hearing on 20.08.2025. 6. Accordingly, the Recovery Officer is requested to adjourn the proceedings beyond 20.08.2025, and the learned DRAT is requested to take up the appeals on 20.08.2025 for final disposal. 2 DRAT This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2025 at 12:20:02 7. The petition, along with all pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. AUGUST 11, 2025/v/kr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2025 at 12:20:02