IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.3264 of 2024 ------ 1. Aruna Taleja @ Anna Janeja, aged about 42 years, wife of Ansu Dewan, resident of Sinha Compound, Ratu Road, P.O.- Hehal, P.S.- Sukhdeonagar, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand; 2. Rajeev Choudhary @ Rajeev Choudhry, aged about 50 years, son of Indradeo Choudhary, resident of Staff Bank Colony, Piska More, P.O.- Hehal, P.S.- Sukhdeonagar, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand; 3. Payal Giridhar @ Smt. Payal Giridhar @ Payal Grridhar, aged about 33 years, wife of Gaurav Kumar, resident of Krishna Nagar Colony, Ratu Road, P.O.- Hehal, P.S.- Sukhdeonagar, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand; 4. Ramesh Chandra Taleja @ Ramesh Chandra Janeja, aged about 66 years; 5. Krishna Narayan Taleja @ Krishna Narayan Janeja, aged about 53 years; Both sons of Brijmohan Taleja, resident of Krishna Nagar Colony, Ratu Road, P.O.- Hehal, P.S.- Sukhdeonagar, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand; … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Rajesh Kumar Verma, aged about 53 years, son of late Jagdish Verma, resident of Karamtoli, P.O.+ P.S.- Lalpur, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand; … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Raj Kishore Sahu, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Priya Shrestha, Spl.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tiwari, Advocate ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-07-02-2025 Heard the parties. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.3020 of 2022 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 12.09.2024. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that Cr.M.P. No.3020 of 2022 stood dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 12.09.2024. It is next submitted that Cr.M.P. No.3020 of 2022 was listed before this Bench but due to inadvertence, since the learned counsel for the petitioner could not mark the case, hence, he could not turn up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated calls when Cr.M.P. No.3020 of 2022 was called out; which resulted in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.3020 of 2022 for non-prosecution vide order dated 12.09.2024. It is next submitted that non-prosecution before this court was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.3020 of 2022 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.3020 of 2022 be restored to its original file. Learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 have not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, Cr.M.P. No.3020 of 2022 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.3020 of 2022 before the concerned Bench after a week. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/