Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2628 (CHH)

Santosh Kumar Agrawal v. Chairman And Ors.

WPS/493/2013 · 2025-04-28

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 493 of 2013 • Santosh Kumar Agrawal S/o Lt Balkishan Agrawal Aged About 52 Years R/o Near Railway Station, Main Market, Batri Bazar, Post And Vill Akaltara, P.S. Akaltara, Distt Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Versus 1. Chairman Durg Rajnandgaon Gramin Bank, Head Office, G.E. Road, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 2. General Manager, Durg Rajnandgaon Gramin Bank, Head Office, G.E. Road, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 3. Sanjay Kadam Senior Manager (Inquiry Officer), Secretariat Of Chairman, Durg Rajnandgaon Gramin Bank, Head Office, G.E. Road, Rajnandgaon, Distt Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 4. R.S. Bisen (Presenting Officer) Durg Rajnandgaon Gramin Bank, G.E. Road, Rajnandgaon, P.S. and District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 5. Ranban Singh Rajput S/o Shri Basant Singh R/o Botebod, Tah Nawagarh, P.S. Nandghat, Distt Durg, Chhattisgarh 6. Narendra Verma S/o Shri Basant Ram Verma R/o Village and Post Kheda, P.S. and Tah Nawagarh, Distt Durg, Chhattisgarh 7. Dev Kumar Verma (Clerk-Cum-Cashier, Durg Rajnandgaon Gramin Bank), S/o Ramdayal Verma, R/o Gurudwara Road, 27 Kholi, Vikas Nagar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents CAUSE TITLE DOWNLOADED FROM CIS PERIPHERY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : None ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board 10.04.2024 1. Since no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 2 08.01.2024 and even today, none appears on his behalf. 2. In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this Petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly the Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Shyna/Priyanka