Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26274 (ALL)

SHIV KISHOR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIC/6740/2025 · 2025-03-05

Vikram D Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:32243 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6740 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shiv Kishor Pandey Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Imtiyaj Ali,Rakesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State. 2. The writ petition has been filed with the following prayer :- "1. Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding respondent No. 2, the District Magistrate, Prayagraj/Licensing Authority, District Prayagraj, to consider and decide Application No. 102/Pra. Shashtra/841 dated 12.01.2023 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition) filed by the petitioner for the grant of an arms license, and to adjudicate the same in accordance with law within a stipulated period, as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice." 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has applied for grant of arms licence before the respondent no. 2 in the year 2023, however, till date the aforesaid application of the petitioner has not been decided by the concerned authority. 4. It is to be seen that before this Court large number of petitions are being filed for directing the licencing authorities to consider the application for grant of arms licence of the applicants. The aforesaid large number of petitions are indicative of the fact that licencing authorities are not considering the applications for grant of arms licence in a time bound manner. The same may be indicative of red tapism, negligence or corrupt practices. The applications of the citizens are required to be considered by the authorities in a time bound manner so that citizens do not face any difficulty on account of pendency of their applications. 5. Learned Standing Counsel submits that application of the petitioner for grant of arms licence would be decided in a time bound manner. 6. Considering the circumstances of the case and the fact that application of the petitioner for grant of arms licence is pending consideration before the respondent no. 2, it is hereby directed that application for grant of arms licence of the petitioner shall be decided by the licencing authority within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. It is hereby also provided that in the event the aforesaid application of the petitioner for grant of arms licence is not disposed of within the period herein above granted, the petitioner would be entitled to cost/compensation @ Rs.100/- per day (for each day delay after two months) which is to be paid by the respondent no. 2 at the first instance and the same would be recoverable by the respondent no. 2 from the salary of the erring officials. This cost/compensation is in addition to the other legal remedies available to the petitioner including the enforcement of the present order, accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 6.3.2025 VMA Digitally signed by :- VISHWA MOHAN ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad