Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26271 (GAU)

SAHADUL HUSSAIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/5447/2023 · 2025-12-11

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010206062023 2025:GAU-AS:17245 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5447/2023 SAHADUL HUSSAIN S/O- LATE ZAKIR HUSSAIN, R/O- NAHARKATIA BATA GALI, P.O AND P.S- NAHARKATIA, DIST- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, PIN-786610 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (ROADS) ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-03 4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DEPARTMENT DIBRUGARH ROAD DIVISION DIBRUGARH 5:THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER PWD (R AND B) DIBRUGARH ROAD CIRCLE Page No.# 2/2 DIBRUGAR Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. H Mazumder Advocate for the respondent(s): B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 12.12.2025 Mr. H Mazumder, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner had expired and accordingly the learned counsel had duly contacted the legal representatives of the petitioner for pursuing the present proceedings. However, the legal representatives of the petitioner have informed that they do not want to further pursue the present proceedings. 2. Taking into account the above submission, the writ petition, is abated and, accordingly, stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant