Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26267 (RAJ)

DWARKA PRASAD SON OF SHRI GOKUL CHAND AGARWAL v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS

CW/12098/2025 · 2025-08-13

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:31640] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12098/2025 Dwarka Prasad Son Of Shri Gokul Chand Agarwal, At- 4K-447- 48, Shivaji Park, Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus Registrar Of Trade Marks, Government Of India, Trade Marks Registry, Boudhik Sampada Bhawan, Antop Hill, S.m. Road, Mumbai-400037 ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.G. D. Bansal with Mr.Dharmendra K Gupta Mr.Rishabh Bansal For Respondent(s) : Mr.Abhi Goyal JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 13/08/2025 1. For a limited purpose, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking direction to the Registrar of Trade Mark to decide the Form TM-24 submitted by the petitioner for registration of the trademark on 07.10.2013 expeditiously within time frame. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid Form TM-24 was submitted in the month of October, 2013 and more than 12 years have passed thereafter till date and still the Form TM-24 has not been decided, therefore, appropriate direction be issued to the Registrar of Trade Mark to decide the Form TM-24 in expeditious way. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection, in case, such direction is issued. [2025:RJ-JP:31640] (2 of 2) [CW-12098/2025] 4. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter and looking to the fact that the Form TM-24 seeking registration of trade mark is lying pending since last more than a decade, i.e., since 07.10.2013, this Court deems it just and proper to issue direction to the Registrar of Trade Mark to decide the Form TM-24 (pending, if any) submitted by the petitioner expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, after providing due opportunity of hearing to all the respective parties and following the due process of law. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. All pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /43