Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26259 (KAR)

SHYLA H K v. PRASHANTH T R

MFA/5030/2022 · 2025-06-20

B M Shyam Prasad, G Basavaraja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21389-DB MFA No. 5030 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5030 OF 2022 (MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. SHYLA H K AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS W/O K. YOGESHAGOWDA 2. Y. KARATHIK S/O K. YOGESHAGOWDA AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS 3. ENDUSHI S/O K. YOGESHAGOWDA AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT HEMAVATHI NAGAR 3RD MAIN ROAD, 7TH CROSS HASSAN DISTRICT - 57320 APPELLANT NO.2 AND 3 MINORS REPRESENTEED BY THEIR MOTHER. …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. KAVITHA H C.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. PRASHANTH T R S/O RAJANNA DHASARKOPPAL VILLAGE AND POST, KASABA HOBLI, Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21389-DB MFA No. 5030 of 2022 SALAGAME ROAD, HASSAN PIN CODE 573201 (OWNER OF THE PALASAR BIKE BEARING REG NO. KA-13-Y 6541). 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED HARSHAMAHAL ROAD, HASSAN 573201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MANJULA N TEJASWI., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 29.08.2019 PASSED IN MVC NO. 1370/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE 2ND ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MEMBER, M.A.C.T., HASSAN, DISMISSING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21389-DB MFA No. 5030 of 2022 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD) The learned counsel for the second respondent submits that copies are not served on her chambers. The requisites are also not furnished for issuance of notice on the application for condonation of delay and the appeal. None appears for the appellants, and this Court can only infer lack of interest in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for default. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE AN/-