IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 15495 of 2025 Decided on: 24.09.2025 Gaurav Mahajan … Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Addl. AG for respondents No.1 to 6. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice confined to respondents No. 1 to 6. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 6. 2. When this case was taken up for consideration today, learned Counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that now a communication has been issued by the Authorities dated 17.09.2025 and interest of justice would be served, in case, this petition is disposed of with the observation that respondent No. 3 shall act on the request made by the petitioner in light of communication dated 17.09.2025. Ordered accordingly. 3. This writ petition is disposed of without any observation on merit with the direction that respondent No.3 shall consider the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 request of the petitioner in light of communication dated 17.09.2025 addressed by respondent No. 4 to respondent No. 3, within a period of three weeks from today. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge September 24, 2025 (narender)