Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26251 (KAR)

S NAGARAJU v. SMT PUSHPA

CRL.RP/996/2022 · 2025-02-01

H P Sandesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4726 CRL.RP No. 996 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.996 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. S. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O SUBBANNA, R/AT 21/8, “SRI LAKSHMI SIDDESHWARA NILAYA”, SIDDALINGAPPA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, KONANAKUNTE CROSS, KANAKAPURA ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 062. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDRAHASA RAI B., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. SMT. PUSHPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, W/O ANIYAPPA, R/AT 19, APS ROAD, SAJAN RAO CIRCLE, V.V. PURAM, BENGALURU -560 018. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. B.R.VISHWANATH, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE CONVICTION AND SENTENCE JUDGMENT DATED 21.12.2017 PASSED BY THE XVI ACMM, BANGALORE IN C.CNO.30580/2014 AND TO SET ASIDE THE CONVICTION AND SENTENCE JUDGMENT DATED 10.03.2020 PASSED BY THE LXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGLAORE(CCH-66) IN CRL.A.NO.95/2018 Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4726 CRL.RP No. 996 of 2022 CONFIRMING THE TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT AND ACQUIT THE REVISION PETITIONER. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER This petition is filed in the year 2022 and the learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. On the previous occasion on 25.01.2025 also the learned counsel for the petitioner was absent. This Court observed that after suspension of sentence, first time, the matter is listed before the Court. Hence, an opportunity is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner. It was made clear that if the learned counsel for the petitioner does not appear on the next date of hearing, the petition will be dismissed for non-prosecution. Inspite of the said order, learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. The learned counsel for the respondent is present. 2. The criminal revision petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39