1 2025:CGHC:18641 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3166 of 2022 1 - Mahesh Kumar Verma (Died) Through Lrs Nill 1.1 - Smt. Mamta Shrivastava W/o Late S.K. Shrivastava, Aged About 62 Years R/o Behind Suruchi Restaurent, Juni Line, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), Through Power Of Attorney Holder Vinay Kumar Verma, S/o Late Mahesh Kumar Verma, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Behind Suruchi Restaurent, Juni Line, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 1.2 - Smt. Samta Shrivastava W/o S.K. Shrivastava, Aged About 59 Years Presently R/o Behind Suruchi Restaurent, Juni Line, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), Through Power Of Attorney Holder Vinay Kumar Verma, S/o Late Mahesh Kumar Verma, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Behind Suruchi Restaurent, Juni Line, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 1.3 - Vinay Kumar Verma S/o Late Mahesh Kumar Verma Aged About 57 Years R/o Behind Suruchi Restaurent, Juni Line, Bilaspur, Tahsil Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 And District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), Through Power Of Attorney Holder Vinay Kumar Verma, S/o Late Mahesh Kumar Verma, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Behind Suruchi Restaurent, Juni Line, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 1.4 - Rajesh Kumar Verma S/o Late Mahesh Kumar Verma Aged About 53 Years R/o Nagda (M.P.) Presently R/o Behind Suruchi Restaurent, Juni Line, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), Through Power Of Attorney Holder Vinay Kumar Verma, S/o Late Mahesh Kumar Verma, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Behind Suruchi Restaurent, Juni Line, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Arun Kumar Verma S/o Late Shankar Prasad Verma, Aged About 74 Years R/o B-24, Shailendra Nagar, Near Bagrecha Nursing Home, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vidya B. Soni, Advocate on behalf of Mr. B.P. Singh, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 24/04/2025 3 1. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the interim order has been challenged before this Court, however, the case has already been decided by the Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, as such, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat