VIKRAM SINGH TANWAR S/O MUSADDI SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA
CW/12571/2024 · 2025-01-08
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26249 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26249 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:1145] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12571/2024 Vikram Singh Tanwar S/o Musaddi Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Purushottampura, Tehsil Paota, District Jaipur, Rajasthan, Roll No. 4505111801. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary Of Ministry Of Home Affairs, Government Of India, New Delhi.
2. Director General, Sashastra Seema Bal, East Block-V,R.K. Puram, New Delhi, 110066.
3. Commandant (Rectt.), Sashastra Seema Bal, Est Block V,R.K. Puram, New Delhi, 110066.
4. Commandant
(Med),
Presiding
Officer
(RME) Documentation & DME/RME CT to SI (Non GD) 2023 4th BN Sashastra Seema Bal, Lucknow. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nikhil Saini for Mr. Inder Raj Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.D. Rastogi, ASG with Mr. Devesh Yadav Mr. Chinmay Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 08/01/2025
Learned counsel for Union of India while placing reliance upon the order dated 20.11.2024 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17309/2024 titled as Chitra Sharma vs. The Union of India & anr., has submitted that a matter of akin facts qua the issue of territorial jurisdiction is pending before the Division Bench. It is further submitted that the petitioner can avail
[2025:RJ-JP:1145] (2 of 2) [CW-12571/2024] appropriate remedy before the appropriate Bench, in the light of the above cited order.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to refute the
contentions of the learned counsel for the respondents. Considering the facts and circumstances of the instant matter, and taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, this Court is of the opinion that the instant matter can be disposed of for statistical purposes and if the petitioner deems it appropriate, he shall be at liberty to approach the appropriate Bench in light of the order passed in Chitra Sharma (Supra). Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of in above terms. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/127