CRM-M-8811 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 201 DHARAM SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. for the petitioner. Mr. Satjot Singh Chahal, AAG, Punjab. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The instant petition has been filed under Section 2023, seeking 04.12.2024, registered under Section Arms Act, at Police Station 2. As per allegations in the FIR Deputy Chief Minister of Golden Temple, was pistol and firin disclosed his name as 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR been implicate accused from whom the weapon of offence already stands 8811-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of Decision: DHARAM SINGH Versus PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Balbir Singh Sewak, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satjot Singh Chahal, AAG, Punjab. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section seeking pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in case , registered under Section 109 of BNS at Police Station E Division, Amritsar As per allegations in the FIR, an Chief Minister Sukhbir Singh Badal, who was of Golden Temple, was made by someone from the public ng a shot at him. The person was apprehended on the spot his name as Narayan Singh. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR, nor any role has been attributed to him ed only on the basis of a disclosure statement made by the main accused from whom the weapon of offence released on regular bail. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8811-2025 Date of Decision: 22.04.2025 …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA , Advocate Mr. Satjot Singh Chahal, AAG, Punjab. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 BNSS, arrest bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.134 dated BNS and Sections 25 and 27 of E Division, Amritsar. n attempt on the life of former Sukhbir Singh Badal, who was sitting outside the gate by someone from the public by taking out a was apprehended on the spot and Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has has been attributed to him. He has disclosure statement made by the main accused from whom the weapon of offence has also been recovered. He BNSS, dated and Sections 25 and 27 of ormer outside the gate a and Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has s disclosure statement made by the main e Aman Dua 2025.04.22 18:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CRM-M-8811 4. Learned State counsel, on the contrary, contends that the petitioner is actively invol been recorded whereof have petitioner was days along with the main accused inside custodial interrogation is involvement. 5. Submissions made by learned counsel for the parties have been considered. 6. Looking allegations as well as the material collected by the prosecution, this Court is not inclined to grant the pre 7. A 22.04.2025 Ad 8811-2025 -2- Learned State counsel, on the contrary, contends that the actively involved with the main accused and his movement been recorded in CCTV cameras installed at been mentioned in the status report dated following the former Deputy Chief Minister from the last two days along with the main accused inside Shri Akal Takth Sahib custodial interrogation is required to unearth Submissions made by learned counsel for the parties have been Looking at the gravity of the case and the nature of the allegations as well as the material collected by the prosecution, this Court is not inclined to grant the pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Learned State counsel, on the contrary, contends that the ved with the main accused and his movements have Shri Akal Takth Sahib; details been mentioned in the status report dated 24.02.2025. The ormer Deputy Chief Minister from the last two Shri Akal Takth Sahib. Therefore, his the conspiracy and fathom his Submissions made by learned counsel for the parties have been at the gravity of the case and the nature of the allegations as well as the material collected by the prosecution, this Court is il to the petitioner. dismissed. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Learned State counsel, on the contrary, contends that the e s 24.02.2025. The ormer Deputy Chief Minister from the last two . Therefore, his his Submissions made by learned counsel for the parties have been at the gravity of the case and the nature of the allegations as well as the material collected by the prosecution, this Court is ) Aman Dua 2025.04.22 18:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document