Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26241 (GAU)

SAHIDA BIBI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM and 7 ORS.

WP(C)/6136/2017 · 2025-10-30

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010143322017 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6136/2017 SAHIDA BIBI W/O- ABBAS ALI, R/O- BANIAMARI PART-III, AMBARI PONENAIANI, MAHAMAYA, P.S- GOURIPUR, DIST- DHUBRI, PIN- 783331, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and 7 ORS. REP. BY THE PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVT OF ASSAM, ASSAM SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GHY- 06, KAMRUPM, ASSAM 2:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER MAHAMAYA DEVELOPMENT BLOCK BOGRIBARI P.O. BOGRIBARI DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTAD PIN - 783349 3:NURUL ISLAM JUNIOR ENGINEER MAHAMAYA DEVELOPMENT BLOCK BOGRIBARI P.O. BOGRIBARI DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTAD PIN - 783349 4:AMJAD SHEIKH FORMER GENERAL SECRETARY MAHAMAYA DEVELOPMENT BLOCK BOGRIBARI P.O. BOGRIBARI Page No.# 2/3 DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTAD PIN - 783349 5:JABEDA BIBI VILL- BANIAMARI PART III P.S. GOURIPUR P.O. GOURIPUR PIN - 783349 6:MOHIM BARGAYARI AMBARI PONUNAYANI GAON PANCHAYAT PANCHAYAT SECRETARY P.O. BOGNIBARI PIN - 783349 7:FULURUDDIN SHEIKH AMBARI PONENAYANI GAON PANCHAYAT PANCHAYAT SECRETARY P.O. BOGNIBARI PIN - 783349 8:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AMCO ROAD S.O. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN - 78332 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.R BEGUM, DR.B N GOGOI,MR.A DAS,MSG BORA,MS.M GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR.A RASHID(R-7),MR.M HUSSAIN(R-7) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 31-10-2025 There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner today on call. When the case was listed previously on 19.09.2025, none had appeared for the petitioner on that day also. Page No.# 3/3 No steps are found to have been taken for issuance of notice upon the respondent nos. 3, 4 & 6 despite orders of this Court. It was observed on 19.09.2025 that in case of default in taking steps, appropriate order would be passed. In the above backdrop, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is not interested to pursue this petition further. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant