Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26235 (AP)

MEDURI NIRMALA, v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH,

WP/17831/2019 · 2025-06-30

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010371482019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 17831/2019 Between: 1. MEDURI NIRMALA,, D/O. M.VEERABRAHMA CHARYULU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC GOVT. TEACHER, RIO. RTC COLONY, 5TH LINE, NEAR INDIAN BLOOM SCHOOL, GUNTUR-1, A.P 2. NANDURI BHANUJA,, D/O. N.NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC GOVT. TEACHER, R/O. P.NO.502, ANNAPURNA NAGAR, 4TH LINE, GORANTLA, GUNTUR, A.P. 3. SK. MAHAMMAD BABU,, S/O. SAIFUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC GOVT. TEACHER, R/O. D.NO.12-136/1, PADAMATA BAZAR, TADIKONDA, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 4. KADARAVALLI POORNA NAGES WART DEVI,, D/O. K.N.K. BRAHMANANDA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC GOVT. TEACHER, R/O. D.NO.1-96, GOWADA, AMRUTALLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT., SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST. 522 503, A.P. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, ANDHRA PRADESH, HAVING OFFICE AT MYLAVARAM ROAD, BHIMARAJU GUTTA, IBRAHIMPATNAM VIJAYAWADA, 521 456, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, , GUNTUR DISTRICT HAVING OFFICE AT R AND B QUARTERS, GUNTUR GUNTUR DIST. 522 004, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents NO.1 and 2 in issuing Memo No434204/Services.II/A-1/2016, dated 08.06.2018 of the 1st respondent and consequently memo issued in Rc.no.2007/Esst.IV/2015 dated 20.8.2018 of the Respondent.2, as illegal arbitrary, violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and principles of natural justice , and consequently set aside the Memo No.434204/Services.II/A-1/2016, dated 08.06.2018 of the 1st respondent and consequently memo issued in Rc.no.2007/Esst.IV/2015 dated 20.8.2018 of the Respondent.2. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M P KASHYAP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to issue Writ or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in issuing Memo No.434204/Services II/A1/2016, dated 08.06.2018 of the 1st respondent and consequently memo issued in Rc.no.2007/Esst IV/2015, dated 20.8.2018 of the Respondent No.2 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and principles of natural justice and consequently, set aside the Memo No.434204/Services II/A1/2016, dated 08.06.2018 of the 1st respondent and consequently, memo issued in Rc.no.2007/Esst IV/2015, dated 20.8.2018 of the Respondent 2.....” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioners and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioners today. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Education appearing for respondents is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 17831 of 2019 01.07.2025 Mjl /*