Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26231 (AP)

R.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, v. A.P. STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORP. LTD. & ANOTHER,

WP/25643/2005 · 2025-05-08

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 25643 OF 2005 Between: R.S. Ramachandra Rao, S/o. R. Shivaramaiah, aged about 44 Technical Assistant, Grade-111, , Q/o. the District Manager, A.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Sahg^eddy, Medak District. years. ...PETITIONER AND 1. A.P. State Civil Supplies Oorp. Ltd, Regd. Office: 6-3-655/1/A, C.S. Bhawan, Somajiguda, HydeMd 500 004 Rep. by its Vice Chairman & Managing Director. 2. Joint Collector & Ex Officio Executive Director, A.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, West Godavari District, Eluru 534 006. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 dPthe Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order direction or writ particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ after calling for the records quash the proceedings No. P.A^nJ;56(1')/2001 dated 16-08-2002 imposing the penalty of stoppage of 2 increments with cumulative effect without conducting enquiry is illegal and in; violation of principles of natural justice. 'J* ; ; ’vj I.A. NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 32658 OF 2005^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the production of the certified coy of the Proceedings of the Joint Collector & EO ED-APSCS-CL. Eluru, in No. P. Admn.56(1)/2001, dt. 16-08-2002. I.A. NO: 2 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 32989 OF 20051 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent not to give effect to the penalty of stoppage of 2 increments with cumulative effect. Counsel for the Petitioner: MS. K UDAYA SRI (NOT PRESENT) _ cum Respondents: SRI A RAVINDER REDDY (SC FOR ClV oUPL CL) Counsel for the Respondents: SRI D LINGA RAO ^ The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010370402005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT ! ii \ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 25643/2005 Between: R.s. Ramachandra Rao, ...PETITIONER AND A P State Oivi! Siipolies Oorp Ltd A.nothe^ and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT(S) 1.KUDAYASRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.A RAVINDER REDDY(SC FOR CIV SUPL CL) 2.D LINGARAO The Court made the following: ORDER For no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 09.04.2025 and 25.04.2025 and since the matter is old, the matter came to be listed today under the caption "for dismissal". Despite the same, today also there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU deputy ^GISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// if To, 1. One CC to Ms. K Udaya Sri Advocate [OPUC] D Linga Rao Advocate [OPUC] 4. Three CD Copies TF (gsg) [OPUC] HIGH COURT DATED:09/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.25643 of 2005 5 2 ^ SEP 2025 rn 93h ^ Current Section WTHOurco™!'" '’- '‘“"■'■'’OSECUTION,