Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26225 (RAJ)

BIMAL KUMAR SHAH SON OF LATE SHRI RAMESH CHANDRA SHAH v. THE UNION OF INDIA

CW/11799/2025 · 2025-08-07

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:30371] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11799/2025 Bimal Kumar Shah Son Of Late Shri Ramesh Chandra Shah, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of 10/61, Swarn Path Mansarover Jaipur 302020 (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Union Of India, Through Its Secretary Finance The Department Of Finance 6A, 3Rd Floor, North Block Jeevandeep Building, Sansad Marg New Delhi 110001 2. The Securities And Exchange Board Of India, Through Its Chairman 807, 8Th Floor Okay Plus Tower, Near Vishal Mega Mart, Near Govt. Hostel, Ajmer Road Jaipur 302001 Rajasthan. 3. Tata Elxi Limited, Through Its Managing Director Itpb Road, Whitefield, Bangaluru Karnataka 560048 4. Mufg Intime India Private Limited, Through Its Managing Director C-101, 1St Floor, 247 Park, Lal Bahadur Shatri Marg, Vikhroli (West) Membai 400083 5. Bhagwatiben W/o Patel Ghanshyambhai, Uday Nagar, Near Vrundavan Society, Unjha, Mahesana Gujarat 354170 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hans Kumar Sharma with Mr. Avinash Meghwal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Anita Agrawal with Mr. Laxmikant Tailor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 07/08/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has filed a memo of grievance/representation to Respondent no.1 and 2 for the wrongful action and illegal action [2025:RJ-JP:30371] (2 of 2) [CW-11799/2025] qua share transfer agent i.e. Respondent No.4, however, the same is not considered. Learned counsel for the respondents has marked presence and has submitted that the representation filed by the petitioner will be considered within a period of fortnight by the competent authority i.e. respondent No.2 or appropriate delegated authority. Considering the assurance given by the learned counsel for the respondent, this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to file an amended representation, if so chooses, within a period of seven days from the date of passing of this order, and the same shall be adjudicated by the respondent authorities as per the dictum encapsulated in Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024; Neutral Citation: 2024:RJ- JP:5792), within a period of 20 days thereafter, in accordance with law and as per facts. In light of the above, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/10