2025:JHHC:26641 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.5949 of 2024 ------ 1. Amar Prabhat, aged about 39 years, son of Shiv Shankar Prasad Sinha, resident of House No.35, Vikash Nagar, Ramgarh, PO, PS. Ramgarh & District- Ramgarh. 2. Siyaram Roy, aged about 39 years, son of Kailash Prasad Roy, Resident of Shrimatpur, P.O. & PS.- Pirpainti & District- Bhagalpur (Bihar). … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, PO & PS- Dhurwa & District- Ranchi. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Bhawan, Ranchi, PO & PS- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi. 3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Forest, Environment and Climate Change, Government of Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House, PO & PS-Doranda & District- Ranchi. 4. The Jharkhand Public Service Commission through its Chairman, having its office at Circular Road, PO-Ranchi, PS- Kotwali & District- Ranchi. 5. The Secretary, Jharkhand Public Service Commission, having its office at Circular Road, PO -Ranchi, PS- Kotwali, District- Ranchi. 6. The Examination Controller, Jharkhand Public Service Commission, having its office at Circular Road, PO -Ranchi, PS- Kotwali, District- Ranchi. … … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the petitioner : Ms. Tanya Singh, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Faisal Allam, AC to SC Mines-III Mr. Pravin Kr. Pandey, Advocate Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate ------ 05/ 02nd September,2025 1. Heard the parties. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners praying to fix the cut-off date for the purpose of calculating the upper age limit. 3. Though the relaxation has been sought for by the petitioners computing the upper age limits but they have already crossed the upper age limit of appointment. 4. During course of argument, it has been brought to the notice of this Court by the parties that pursuant to the 2025:JHHC:26641 2 Advertisement, the examination has already been held. Further, the petitioner has approached this Court after the last date which was fixed by the respondents for filling-up the forms. Since the examination has already been held, no relief can be granted to the petitioner, thus, this writ petition is dismissed. 5. Pending Interlocutory applications, if any, stand also dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Sandeep, cp3