1 APHC010005802020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 669/2020 Between: Smt.haseena Fakroddin, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MD SALEEM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard Sri Md. Saleem, learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Registration and Stamps, appearing for the respondents. 2. Being aggrieved by the action of the respondents in entertaining the registrations of sale & other registered transactions in respect of properties belonging to the petitioner located in Sy. Nos.405-1B, 405-2 & 407-2 of Kotnur Grama polam and 4 plots in an extent of 377 Sq. feet each situated in TS 2 No.78 & 79 of Ward No.4, Part.3, Block.3, Old D.Nos.17-2-151 & 17-2-152 of Hindupur Grama Polam within the limits of Hindupur Municipal Area, Ananthapur District, the instant Writ Petition is filed. 3. It is contended by the petitioner that the petitioner has already made a representation to the respondent authorities not to entertain any transactions in respect of the subject property on 29.11.2019. However, the respondents have not passed any order on the said representation. It is stated that there is a civil dispute pending between the petitioner and unofficial respondents in O.S. No.488 of 2019 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Hindupur, Ananthapur District, against respondents 4 & 5. 4. Considered the rival submissions. 5. As noted from the representation made by the petitioner, it is addressed to the Sub Registrar, Hindupur, stating that the petitioner’s husband, along with his sons has purchased the subject property in the name of the petitioner’s sons' and they have been jointly enjoying the property. However, the petitioner’s sons’ have been fraudulently alienating the subject lands. The grievance of the petitioner in the Writ Petition is that registering authorities should not entertain the documents that may be submitted by her sons. The relief sought by the petitioner is in the nature of an injunction which is not within the jurisdiction of the registering authorities. In view of the same, the relief sought by the petitioner does not merit consideration. 3 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date:25.02.2025 MVK 4 253 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION No.669 of 2020 Date:25.02.2025 MVK