RAMESH CHAND MEENA S/O SHRI MOHAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/772/2020 · 2025-01-08
Ashutosh Kumar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26207 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26207 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:1191] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 772/2020 Ramesh Chand Meena S/o Shri Mohar Singh, Aged About 48 Years, R/o D-195 Kusum Vihar Jagatpura Jaipur At Present Assistant Engineer Jaipur Discom Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar with Mr. Ankit Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order 08/01/2025
1. The matter comes upon an application No.1/2023 moved on behalf of the petitioner to take on record the letter dated 23.05.2023 written by the Additional Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, Jhunjhunu to learned Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption Act, Alwar.
2. This petition has been filed against the order dated 07.09.2020 passed by learned Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption Act, Alwar, by which the learned trial Court while allowing the application of the Investigating Agency granted permission to take specimen of voice sample of petitioner- Ramesh Chand Meena.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the Investigating Agency sought permission for taking voice sample of the petitioner and the permission was duly granted, but now the
[2025:RJ-JP:1191] (2 of 2) [CRLW-772/2020] prosecution had moved an application for not taking any voice sample of the petitioner, therefore, in that view of the matter the petition filed by the petitioner has become infructuous.
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
4. In that view of the above, application No.1/2023 is allowed, the document annexed with the application is taken on record and the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
5. Pending application(s) also stands disposed of.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J TANISHA /349