Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26201 (CHH)

SMT. KUSUM BAI KAIWART v. GAYATRI BAI

WPC/3568/2021 · 2025-08-28

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3568 of 2021 1 - Smt. Kusum Bai Kaiwart W/o Santosh Kumar Kaiwart Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Gadi, Tahsil Seepat, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Gayatri Bai W/o Santosh Kumar Kaiwart Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Madai, Sub Tahsil Seepat, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Koushilya Bai W/o Bharat Lal Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Madai, Sub Tahsil Seepat, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Neera Bai W/o Kamalkant Sahu Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Madai, Sub Tahsil Seepat, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Radha Bai Sahu W/o Ram Lal Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Madai, Sub Tahsil Seepat, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Radhika Bai Sahu W/o Vinod Kukmar Sahu Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Madai, Sub Tahsil Seepat, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Tulsi Bai W/o Sanjay Kaiwart Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Madai, Sub Tahsil Seepat, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Chief Election Cum Tahsildar Masturi Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 8 - Presiding Officer Polling Center No. 33, 34, 35 Janpad Panchayat Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.08.29 17:52:28 +0530 2 9 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Cum Prescribed Authority Under Panchayt Raj Adhiniyam, Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Yogesh Chandra, Advocate For State : Mr. Shubham Bajpai, P.L. For Respondent No. 5 : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Manikpuri, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order On Board 29-08-2025 1) Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that by efflux of time, this petition has become infructuous. 2) Recording the submission made hereinabove, instant writ petition stands dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya