Madurai Thennaga Vaniyar Sangam v. The Commissioner
CMP/6022/2025 · 2025-03-19
K Rajasekar, S M Subramaniam
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26199 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26199 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
C.M.P.No.6022 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.23568 of 2025 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and K.RAJASEKAR, J. The learned counsel for the 3rd respondent raised an objection, stating that the reasons for condoning the delay of 135 days are inadequate.
2. However, this Court is of the opinion that the delay cannot be considered enormous to the extent of declining the relief.
3. Therefore, in view of the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of this miscellaneous petition to condone the delay of 135 days in filing the writ appeal is condoned.
4. Accordingly, this Miscellaneous Petition stands ordered.
[S.M.S., J.] [K.R.S., J.] 19.03.2025 Jeni Note: Registry is directed to number the writ appeal, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis