CR-985-202 IN THE HIG 123 Gurdarshan S Harpreet Sin CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 14.01.2025 Division), L No. 9 and 10 a suit seekin No. 2 and 3 qua land me kanals 0 mar framed by th moved an ap 10 and Sect No. 9 and 1 dated 24.0 2025 -1- HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA rshan Singh and another Versus eet Singh and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Kulwant Singh, Advocate f I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Challenge in the present revisio 2025 (Annexure P-8), passed by the on), Ludhiana, whereby the defence and 10 was struck off. Brief facts of the case are that seeking Mandatory Injunction agains and 3 herein, to execute and register s nd measuring 11 kanals 0 marlas ou 0 marlas as fully detailed in the head d by the learned trial Court on 16.08.2 an application under Order I Rule 1 d Section 151 CPC, for impleading and 10 which was allowed by the l 24.01.2024 (Annexure P-4). I D HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-985-2025 Date of Decision: 15.02.2025 .… Petitioners .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA ocate for the petitioners. evision petition is to the order dated by the learned Civil Judge (Junior fence of the petitioners/defendants that respondent No. 1-plaintiff filed against the defendants/respondents ister sale deed in favour of plaintiff las out of total land measuring 25 head note of the plaint. Issues were 16.08.2018. Thereafter, the plaintiff ule 10 read with Order XXII Rule ading the petitioners as defendants the learned trial Court vide order 4). It is the case of the ated nior ants filed ents 25 ere ule ants rder the RISHU KATARIA 2025.02.17 13:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CR-985-202 petitioners/d the learned contesting th in appearanc counsel to kn the ex parte was later on filed by the p filed anothe which was 29.11.2024 a statement o including petitioners/d failed to do P-8) their d petition. No. 9 and 10 averments m equity, good without issu further delay 2025 -2- ners/defendant Nos. 9 and 10, that the arned trial Court on 11.07.2024 an ting the case and filing reply. Howeve earance on behalf of the petitioners el to know the status of the suit. The pe arte order passed by the learned tri ter on set aside vide order dated 01. y the petitioners. Subsequently, on 29 other application (Annexure P-4) f was disposed of by the learned t 2024 and the case was adjourned to ent on behalf of the petitioners. ing one last and final opportunity ners/defendants No. 9 and 10 to do to do so; and vide impugned order their defence has been struck off. I have heard learned counsel and 10 and perused the case file in gre Without commenting upon mer ents made in the petition, but in view o , good conscience and fair play; this t issuing Notice of Motion to the r r delay be matter; the impugned order hat they have received notices from 24 and they engaged counsel for owever, the said counsel had not put and they have engaged another he petitioners came to know about ned trial Court against them, which ted 01.10.2024 upon an application on 29.10.2024, the petitioners have 4) for production of documents rned trial Court vide order dated ed to 16.12.2024, for filing written ners. Thereafter, 04 opportunities rtunity has been granted to the to do the needful, however, they order dated 14.01.2025 (Annexure off. Hence, the present revision unsel for the petitioners/defendants in great detail. on merits of the case as well as the view of principles of natural justice, this petition is being disposed of the respondents as that will only order dated 14.01.2025 (Annexure rom for t put ther bout hich tion ave ated itten ities the they xure sion ants the tice, only xure RISHU KATARIA 2025.02.17 13:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CR-985-202 P-8) is set opportunity ₹20,000/- plaintiff. 15.02.2025 rishu 2025 -3- set aside. It is directed that the petitio tunity to submit their written statemen to be paid by the petitioners Pending application(s), if any, s 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable petitioners be granted one effective tement, however, subject to costs of ners directly to respondent No. 1- any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No tive ts of RISHU KATARIA 2025.02.17 13:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.