3 APHC010369992002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 647 OF 2002 Appeal under section 100 of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree dated 13.04.1994 made in A.S No.48 of 1999 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge Markapur Preferred against the Decree in O.S No.353 of 1977 Dated 30.10.1982 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge Chirala. Between: Mekala Aharan S/o Prasada rao aged about 35 years, Christian Cultivation, Mankenapalli, Vetapalem. ...APPEALLANT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF AND 1. Gopathoti Vandanam (Died) 2. Gopathoti Prakasam S/o Vandanam, aged about 54 years. 3. Gopathoti Samel S/o Vandanam, aged about 45 years. 4. Gopathoti Israil S/o Vandanam, aged about 39 years. 5. Gopathoto Venkata Subbamma W/o Vandanam, aged about 70 (R5 disd default Vide Co. dated 20/04/2011) (All are resident of Vetapalem Prakasam District.) ...RESPONDENT/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS years. % Counsel for the Petitioner : D.GAYATHRI Counsel for the Respondent: CH SUDHAKAR BABU The Court made the following JUDGMENT : 4 APHC010369992002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 647/2002 5 [3368] Between: Mekala Aharan ...APPELLANT AND Gopathoti Vandanam Died 4 Ors Counsel for the Appellant: ...RESPONDENT 1.D.GAYATHRI Counsel for the Respondent: 1.CH SUDHAKAR BABU The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.647 OF 2002 JUDGMENT: Learned counsel representing Smt.D.Gayathri, learned She reported that no instructions have been received from the appellant to prosecute the appeal. counsel for the appellant present. 2. Notice taken to the sole appellant and the returned unserved with postal endorsement as ‘addressee deceased’, which would show that the sole appellant died long ago. same was 3. In that view of the matter, the appeal stands abated. 4. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any. shall stand closed. SD/- K.TATARAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Subordinate Judge Chirala Prakasam District, (with records) Additional Junior Civil Judge Chirala Prakasam District. 1. The 2. The I 3. One CC to SRI. D.GAYATHRI Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI. CH SUDHAKAR BABU Advocate [OPUC] The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi Three CD Copies 4. 5. 6. TAC f ■ HIGH COURT DATED:25/06/2025 ORDER SA NO. 647 OF 2002 1n SEP m X J o Current Secuon O f: DISMISSING THE SA AS ABATED