- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21574 WP No. 15645 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.15645 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. MAHADEVAIAH S/O SRI KULLAIAH ALIAS KAARYA KULLAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, RESIDING AT KAROHATTI VILLAGE, MUGURU HOBLI, T. NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT KARNATAKA - 571124. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MILASH ARROL NORONHA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KUM. PUTTASIDDAMMA D/O LATE SRI BHOGANANJAIAH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS RESIDING AT KAROHATTI VILLAGE, MUGURU HOBLI, T. NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT KARNATAKA - 571124. 2. SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MYSURU DISTRICT MYSURU Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21574 WP No. 15645 of 2025 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE, GIRIBHOVI PALYA, SIDDARTHNAGAR MYSURU KARNATAKA - 570011. 3. DEPUTY DIVISIONAL OFFICER MYSURU DIVISION, MYSURU OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT LEVEL OFFICERS COMPLEX, SIDDARTHA NAGARA, MYSURU KARNATAKA - 570011. 4. THE TEHSILDHAR T. NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSURU T. NARASIPURA TALUK OFFICE, SH - 84, T NARSIPURA MYSURU DISTRICT KARNATAKA - 571124. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABURAO, AGA ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 15.01.2025 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 IN REVISION PETITION BEARING R.P. NO.64 OF 2023 (RD0050000465100) FILED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 UNDER SECTION 136(3) KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964, VIDE ANNEXURE-C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21574 WP No. 15645 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER The learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for Respondents No.2 to 4. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 15.01.2025, passed by Respondent No.2-Spl. Deputy Commissioner in RP No.64/2023 (Annexure-C), whereby the revision petition filed by Respondent No.1 has been allowed. 4. Upon careful examination of the order passed by Respondent No.2, it is evident that mutation entries were made on the basis of a Mortgage Deed as well as a registered sale deed dated 05.09.1966. The petitioner is claiming rights over the subject land based on a testamentary disposition. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21574 WP No. 15645 of 2025 5. In view of the above, considering the existence of disputed questions of fact relating to the title of the land in question, this Court finds no infirmity in the impugned order. Respondent No.2 has rightly allowed the revision petition filed by Respondent No.1. 6. It is, however, made clear that the petitioner is at liberty to approach the competent civil court to establish his right, title, or interest in respect of the subject land. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29