Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
{1} 925-CP-802-225 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 802 OF 2024 IN WP/686/2024 Aparna Ramling Kore & Others ….Petitioners VERSUS Ranjit Singh Deol & Others …..Respondents ….. Mr. Irfan D. Maniyar, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. V.C. Patil h/f Mr. U.B. Bondar, Advocate for respondent No. 3 .......
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SMT. VAISHALI N. PATIL JADHAV, J.J.
DATE :
09th SEPTEMBER, 2025
ORDER :
1. Respondent No. 3-Education Officer was directed to decide proposals of the petitioners.
2. The Education Officer has filed affidavit in reply stating that proposals of the petitioners are rejected by order dated 10.10.2023 and the same is communicated to the Head Master of the school wherein petitioners are working.
3. Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that because of the deficiencies kept by the Management, the proposals are rejected. Bhagyawant Punde 2025:BHC-AUG:23952-DB
{2} 925-CP-802-225
4. Be that as it may, since the order is complied with contempt petition stands disposed of.
5. Petitioners are at liberty to adopt appropriate remedy.
(SMT. VAISHALI N. PATIL JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Bhagyawant Punde