APHC010370262025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 19276/2025 Between: 1. K. VIJAYA LAKSHMI, W/O. K. VASU AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE, R/O. DOOR NO. 8-1-116, BAZAR STREET, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 2. V. USHARANI,, W/O. V. SIVA SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. RETD. EMPLOYEE, R/O. HOUSE NO. 10-80/2, 7TH CROSS, ROYAL NAGAR, R.C. ROAD, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION CCLA, ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. THE INAM DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be SRS,J W.P.No.19276 of 2025 pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ more particularly in the form of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not discharging his duties including the quasi-judicial functions without numbering the revision petition filed before him and without disposing of the same as early as possible by following due process of law, without causing any undue delay is illegal, arbitrary and against to principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to quickly dispose of the revision, pending before the CCLA forthwith by numbering the revision and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to quickly dispose of the revision, pending before the CCLA forthwith by numbering the revision, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K KRANTI CHAITANYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ::ORDER:: Heard Sri K. Kranthi, Chaitanya, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Divya Teja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioners is that the revision filed by them before respondent No.2, against the proceedings issued by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupati, vide D Dis.G/1204/2019 dated 19.07.2024, has not been disposed of. SRS,J W.P.No.19276 of 2025 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, confirms the pendency of the revision before the learned respondent No.2. He would submit that respondent No.2 will dispose of the revision. 4. Given the submission of learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, without going into the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage with the consent of learned counsel on either side, directing learned respondent No.2 to dispose of the revision filed by the petitioners, against the proceedings issued by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupati vide D Dis.G/1204/2019 dated 19.07.2024, strictly as per law, as expeditiously as possible within six months from the receipt of a copy of the order. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 29.07.2025 ikn SRS,J W.P.No.19276 of 2025 172 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 19276 of 2025 Date: 29.07.2025 IKN