IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Civil Writ Petition No. 15336 of 2025 Date of decision: 23 rd September, 2025. Anup Chand ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ....Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sourav Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Addl. A.G. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral). Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Addl. Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the Judgment passed by a coordinate Bench of Court in CWP No. 4830 of 2023, titled as Inder Singh Thakur & Ors. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors, on 07.04.2025 along with connected matter (Annexure P-2). He further submits that petitioner shall be satisfied in case the respondents are 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 directed to consider and decide the representation, (Annexure P-3) submitted by the petitioner in time bound manner in light of judgment ibid. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of without making any comments on the merits of the case of the petitioner. It is directed that respondents shall consider and decide the representation (Annexure P-3), submitted by the petitioner in light of judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 4830 of 2023, titled as Inder Singh Thakur & Ors. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors, on 07.04.2025 along with connected matter (Annexure P-2), within eight weeks from today by passing a speaking order. In case, the petitioner is found similarly situated as petitioners in Inder Singh Thakur’s case (supra), he shall also be granted the same benefits as granted to petitioners in above referred case. 5. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 23rd September, 2025. (jai)