SMT SUMAN YADAV WIFE OF SHRI RAVI KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/11607/2025 · 2025-08-01
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26161 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26161 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:29411] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11607/2025
1. Smt Suman Yadav Wife Of Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Sector 17, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Zakir Khan, Son Of Shri Bhai Sarai, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Nagla Nehra, Agra, Uttar Pradesh. Presently Neelam Spa Centre, Muhana Mandi Road, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director General Of Police, Police Headquarters, Lalkothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur Commissionerate, Jaipur.
4. Deputy Commissioner Of Police, South, Jaipur.
5. Station House Officer, Police Station, Muhana, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Gour, Advocate. For Respondent(s) :
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 01/08/2025
1. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioners are seeking directions against the respondents not to interfere with their lawful business and not to seal their spa centers and return the seized CCTV cameras and DVRs. Petitioners are seeking departmental action against the police officials who have seized the CCTV cameras and DVRs of the petitioners.
[2025:RJ-JP:29411] (2 of 2) [CW-11607/2025]
2. In the considered opinion of this Court, the aforesaid relief cannot be granted by this Court as disputed questions of facts are involved ‘whether the petitioner is running a lawful business or not’. These disputed questions cannot be adjudicated by writ Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The same can be decided by the competent authority/competent Court. In case the petitioners have any grievance against anyone, they are at liberty to approach appropriate forum of law for redressal of their grievances.
3. With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition stands
disposed of. The stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Tushar/33