Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2616 (PNJ)

SUKHJINDER SINGH SANDHU v. SHRUTI SINGH, IAS AND ANOTHER

COCP/6277/2025 · 2026-05-05

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-6277 IN THE HI 215 Sukhjinder S Ms. Shruti S CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Court in CW Punjab and direction to decide afresh 2. submits that (Annexure P respondent nothing surv 3. supplied to l 4. 6277-2025 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o inder Singh Sandhu Versus hruti Singh and another M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Narinder Pal Sharma, Advo Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 22.04.2025 (Annex CWP-8117-2021, titled as ‘Sukhjin and others’, whereby the writ peti on to the respondents to reconsider th afresh within a period of 06 months. At the very outset, learned that in compliance of the Writ C xure P-1), a Speaking Order dated 04 dents whereby claim of the petitione g survives in the present petition. A copy of the Speaking Orde ed to learned counsel for the petitioner Heard. ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-6277-2025 Date of Decision: 05.05.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA , Advocate for the petitioner. AAG, Punjab. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ ukhjinder Singh Sandu vs. State of it petition was disposed of with a ider the grievance of petitioner and nths. rned counsel for the respondents rit Court order dated 22.04.2025 04.05.2026 has been passed by titioner has been rejected. As such, Order dated 04.05.2026 has been itioner. ging Writ e of th a and d by uch, een RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.06 09:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-6277 5. required to b of, according 6. Speaking O 7. 8. 05.05.2026 rishu 6277-2025 -2- In view of the facts noted a ed to be passed in the present petition; ordingly. The petitioner would be at libe Order, in accordance with law, if s Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable oted above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed at liberty to challenge the aforesaid , if so advised. any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No are sed said RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.06 09:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.