- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3220 WP No. 22704 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 22704 OF 2017 (GM-KSR) BETWEEN: SMT SHARDHAMMA.R W/O YALLAPPA B.S., AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT BEHIND HALADHAMMA TEMPLE, OLD TOWN, BHADRAVATHI-577 301. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.H.SOMASHEKHARA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. DEPUTY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE, STATE OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 3. THE DISTRICT REGISTER OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT, SHIVMOGGA-577 201. 4. BHADRAVATHI TALUK KURUBARA SANGHA, BY ITS ADMINISTRATOR AND ARCS, SHIVAMOGGA SUB-DIVISION, SHIVAMOGGA-577 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA FOR R1 TO 3; Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3220 WP No. 22704 of 2017 SRI. SUNIL KUMAR.P.BANGARI., ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. KANTHARAJU., ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING RESPONDENT I.A.01/2020) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Mahantesh Shettar., AGA for respondents 1 to 3 has appeared in person. 2. The Order dated:27.04.2017 passed by the second respondent vide Annexure-K is called into question in this Writ Petition on several grounds as setout in the Memorandum of Writ Petition. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. The impugned order is furnished along with the Writ Petition and the same is marked as Annexure-K. A perusal of the same reflects that the administrator was appointed for a period commencing from 19.02.2017 to 18.08.2017. The order was passed in the year 2017. Now we are in the month of January 2025. It's been eight years. Due to efflux of time, the - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3220 WP No. 22704 of 2017 order has spent itself as of today. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. 5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. In view of dismissal of the petition, pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of and the interim order granted by this Court stands discharged. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2