M/S GAJANANA CASHEW INDUSTRIES v. MANAGING DIRECTOR / CEO
WP/3354/2021 · 2025-01-06
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26154 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26154 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:47 WP No. 3354 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 3354 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
M/S. GAJANANA CASHEW INDUSTRIES, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MR.RAGHAVENDRA HEMMANNA, D.NO.1-121A, B.DAMODAR HEMMANNA, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, SIDDAPURA, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI-576 229.
2.
MR. RAGHAVENDRA HEMMANNA S/O DAMODHAR HEMMANNA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, D.NO.1-121A, B.DAMODAR HEMMANNA, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, SIDDAPURA, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI-576 229. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY.T., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MANAGING DIRECTOR/C.E.O, KARNATAKA BANK LIMITED, P.B.NO.599, MAHAVEERA CIRCLE, KANKANADY, MANGALURU-575 002.
2.
THE CHIEF MANAGER AND AUTHORISED OFFICER, KARNATAKA BANK LIMITED, P.B.NO.599, MAHAVEERA CIRCLE, KANKANADY, MANGALURU-575 002.
3.
THE BRANCH MANAGER, KARNATAKA BANK LIMITED,
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:47 WP No. 3354 of 2021
SIDDAPURA BRANCH, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI-576 229. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. Y.V.PARTHASARATHY., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & 3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER Sri.Hareesh Bhandary.T., counsel for the petitioners has appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioners submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel Sri.Hareesh Bhandary.T., submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioners to withdraw the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the order and will not file the Review Petition.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:47 WP No. 3354 of 2021
The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 3 Sl No.: 3