APHC010370072025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19069/2025 Between: 1. SRI KANDULA BAPUJI, S/O, LATE UMA MAHESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, D.NO. 5/213-1, JAVVARUPET, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. SRI UMAR, PDSVIGILANCE AND ENFORCEMENT INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, D. NO. 54-15-1/2, ROAD NO.1, VENKATESWARA VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. SMT SUBHANBI, PDS DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, C/O. TAHSILDAR OFFICE, VUYYURU, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. SRI S V S PARDHAN, PDS DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, C/O. TAHSILDAR OFFICE, VUYYURU, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. SRI KONA NAGARJUNA, S/O. NAGESWARARAO, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS DOOR NO.21/229, BATCHUPETA, MACHILLIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or direction declaring the action of the respondent Nos.2 and 3 in not registering the complaint filed by the petitioner on 10.07.2025 against 2 the respondent Nos.4 to 7 is illegal arbitrary and violation of Article 14 19 and 21 of Indian Constitution Consequently direct the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to register a complaint against the respondent Nos.4 to 7.” 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that a crime was registered against the petitioner. In order to overcome the said case, the petitioner submitted a complaint, which was enquired into by the police and referred as false. Consequently, no crime has been registered based on the petitioner’s representation. 3. Recording the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, it does not preclude the petitioner to work out his remedies before appropriate forum, in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:01.08.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19069 of 2025 Dt.01.08.2025 Asr