IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 15484 of 2025 Decided on : 25.09.2025 Kamlesh Kumari …Petitioners Versus State of Himahcal Pradesh & Anr. …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. L.N. Sharma & Mr. Vishavdeep Sharma, Additional Advocates General, with Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. Virender Singh, Judge (oral) Notice. Mr. L. N. Sharma, learned Addl. A.G., appears and waives service of notice, on behalf of the respondents-State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is under instructions to restrict the relief for direction to the competent authority to decide his representation (Annexure P-4) in a time bound manner. 3. He further submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment passed by 1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 this Court in CWPOA No. 1695 of 2019, titled as Ajay Kumar Thakur & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. & Anr, and the petitioner will be satisfied, in case, the pending representation (Annexure P-4), filed in this behalf, is decided by respondent No. 2/Director of School Education, Shimla, H.P., in a time bound manner. 4. Prayer, being innocuous, is allowed. 5. Accordingly, without adverting to the merits of the case, directions are issued to respondent No. 2/Director of School of Education, Shimla, H.P., to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P-4) of the petitioner, within six weeks, from today by passing a detailed and reasoned order, strictly in terms of judgment passed in Ajay Kumar Thakur’s Case (supra). 6. The petition is accordingly disposed, of along with pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. ( Virender Singh ) Judge September 25, 2025(Shamsh Tabrez)