APHC010369102025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA . WRIT PETITION NO: 18798 OF 2025 Between: 1.G Eeshwar Rao, S/o Late Demudu, R/o Cheedipalem, Mushidipalli Panchayat, Srivangavarapukota Mandal, Vizainagaram District. 2. Podugu Revathi, D/o Rambabu, aged 36 years, R/o Ammapalem Village, Tennuboddavara Panchayat, Sringavarapukota Mandal, Vizainagaram District. 3. Mutyala Sanyasamma, W/o Styam, aged 64 years, R/o Mushidipalli, Sringavarapukota Mandal, Vizainagaram District. 4. Ichapurapu Gopal Rao, S/o Demudu, aged 56 years, R/o Ammapalem Village, Tennuboddavara Panchayat, Sringavarapukota Mandal, Vizainagaram District. ...Petitioners AND 1. The Inspector of Police, Sringavarapukota Mandal, Vizainagaram District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Vizainagaram District. 3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, / (Home Department) Velagapudi, Amaravati. ...Respondents W' Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble court to issue an appropriate writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the actions of the respondents in arbitrarily refusing to give permission to us to express our protest and making demonstrations against the policies and orders of the state such as doing hunger strikes in temporary tents peacefully and to lead a peaceful and silent procession with placards showing the dissent against the actions of the government pertaining to deprival of our lands in favour of a company which is intending to do real estate business with the lands snatched away from our hands ruthlessly as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and in flagrant violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed by constitution and to consequently direct the respondents to permit us to show our protest and dissent by way of silent and unarmed processions on the streets without disturbing the flow of traffic and to do relay hunger strikes in temporary tents and to do such ail other ways of peaceful protest and demonstrations etc., against the policy and orders of the state government in unjustly depriving from our lands for a company which is proposing to do real estate business instead of establishing the proposed aluminum refinery complex without fulfilling the RR package. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pass an interim order permitting us or to direct the respondents to permit us consequently direct the respondents to permit us to show our protest and dissent by way of silent and unarmed processions on the streets without disturbing the flow of traffic and to do relay hunger strikes in temporary tents and to do such all other ways of peaceful protest and demonstrations etc., against the policy and orders of the state government in unjustly depriving us ^ from our lands for a company which is proposing to do real estate business instead of establishing the proposed aluminum refinery complex without fulfilling the RR package. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI K SARVA BHOUMA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: APHC010369102025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY.THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18798/2025 [3396] THE Between; R/0 CHEEDIPALEM, 0 EESHWAR RAO, S/0 LATE DEMUDU. MUSHIDIPALLI PANCHAYAT, SRIVANGAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, VIZAINAGARAM DISTRICT. 1.G R/0 D/0 RAMBABU, AGED 36 YEARS, TENNUBODDAVARA 2.PODUGU REVATHI AMMAPALEM VILLAGE. SRINGAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, VIZAINAGARAM DISTRICT. PANCHAYAT, R/0 SANYASAMMA, W/0 STYAM, AGED 64 YEARS SRINGAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, VIZAINAGARAM 3.MUTYALA MUSHIDIPALLI DISTRICT. I GOPAL RAO, S/0 DEMUDU, AGED 56 YEARS, R/0 PANCHAYAT, 4.ICHAPURAPU AMMAPALEM SRINGAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, VIZAINAGARAM DISTRICT TENNUBODDAVARA VILLAGE, ...PETITIONER(S) AND POLICE, SRINGAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL 1.THE INSPECTOR OF VIZAINAGARAM DISTRICT. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIZAINAGARAM DISTRICT. 2.THE 3.THE STATE OF ANDHRA SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT) VELAGAPUDI, PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL AMARAVATI. ...RESPONDENT(S); 2 Petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is therefore prayed that this Honble court to issue an appropriate writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the actions of the respondents in arbitrarily refusing to give permission to us to express our protest and making demonstrations against the policies and orders of the state such as doing hunger strikes in temporary tents peacefully and to lead a peaceful and silent procession with placards showing the dissent against the actions of the government pertaining to deprival of our lands in favour of a company which is intending to do real estate business with the lands snatched away from our hands ruthlessly as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and in flagrant violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed by constitution and to consequently direct the respondents to permit us to show our protest and dissent by way of silent and unarmed processions on the streets without disturbing the flow of traffic and to do relay hunger strikes in temporary tents and to do such all other ways of peaceful protest and demonstrations etc., against the policy and orders of the state government in unjustly depriving from our lands for a company which is proposing to do real estate business instead of establishing the proposed aluminum refinery complex without fulfilling the RR package and to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pass an interim order permitting us or to direct the respondents to permit us consequently direct the respondents to permit us to show our protest and dissent by way of silent and unarmed processions on the streets without disturbing the flow of traffic and to do relay hunger strikes in temporary tents and to do such all other ways of peaceful protest and demonstrations etc., against the policy and orders of the state government in unjustly depriving us from our lands for a company which is proposing to do real estate business instead of establishing the proposed aluminum refinery complex without fulfilling the RR package. Counsel for the Petitioner{S): 1. K SARVA BHOUMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S); 3 / 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following; ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “...topleased for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is therefore prayed that this Honble court to issue an appropriate writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the actions of the respondents in arbitrarily refusing to give permission to us to express our protest and making demonstrations against the policies and orders of the state such as doing hunger strikes in temporary tents peacefully and to lead a peaceful and silent procession with placards showing the dissent against the actions of the government pertaining to deprival of our lands in favour of a company which is intending to do real estate business with the lands snatched away from our hands ruthlessly illegal, arbitrary and unjust and in flagrant violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed by constitution and to consequently direct the respondents to permit us to show our protest and dissent by way of silent and unarmed processions on the streets without disturbing the flow of traffic and to do relay hunger strikes in temporary tents and to do such all other ways of peaceful protest and demonstrations etc., against the policy and orders of the state government in unjustly depriving from our lands for a company which is proposing to do real estate business instead of establishing the proposed aluminum refinery complex without fulfilling the RR package and to pass....” Heard Sri K.Sarvabhouma Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Smt.A.Jayanthi, learned Government Pleader for Home. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the police refusing to give permission to the petitioners to protest and making demonstrations against the policies. Learned Government Pleader would submit that the petitioner has nothing to do with the transaction, 2'^'^ and petitioner has received as 2. 3. are 4. 4 compensation. Coming to the 4'^ petitioner his father received compensation. Learned Government Pleader would further submit that as can be seen from the record, the petitioners have submitted a report to the police seeking their permission to conduct a protest from 05.07.2025 to 12.07.2025. By this time the days have lapsed. Learned Government Pleader finally would submit that this writ petition may be dismissed. Considering the submissions made, this writ petition is disposed of. 5. However, the petitioners are at liberty to make a fresh representation to the police in advance. The police are directed to consider the same and take an appropriate decision according to governing rules and law. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- P. VINOD KU!V!AR ’ ASSISTANT^REGiSTRAR WsEO //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To, Inspector of Police, Sringavarapukota Mandal, Vizainagaram 1. The District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Vizainagaram District. 3. The Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, (Home Department) Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 4. One CC to Sri K Sarva Bhouma Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCS to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies RAM HIGH COURT DATED:23/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 18798 OF 2025 ^ 2 5 JUL 2025 if Co DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS