Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26148 (JHR)

DHIRENDRA PAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/4424/2020 · 2025-08-05

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:21955 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P (S). No. 4424 of 2020 ------- Dhirendra Pal, son of Sri Sikandar Pal, resident of village Belhara, P.O. Ratnag, P.S. Pandu, District Palamau. ……….. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, HEC Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District Ranchi, Jharkhand-822101. 3. The Divisional Commissioner, Palamau, P.O. & P.S. Medni Nagar, District Palamau, Jharkhand-822101. 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Palamau, P.O. & P.S. Medni Nagar, District Palamau, Jharkhand-822101. 5. The District Education Officer, New Collectorate Building, Block- C, Medninagar, P.O. & P.S. Medninagar, Palamau, Jharkhand- 822101. ……….. Respondents ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajendra Krishna, Advocate Mr. Shubham Mayank, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, AC to GP-I ---- 04/ 05.08.2025 The Instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing the termination order dated 07.12.2020. 2. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that petitioner was appointed vide Advertisement dated 28.07.2010 issued by the respondents and the said advertisement was finally quashed by the Hon’ble Apex Court. As such, even if the case is allowed in favour of the petitioner no fruitful purpose will be served. 3. In this background, the instant writ application is dismissed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Kunal