Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26145 (GAU)

FARUK AHMED CHOUDHURY v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS.

WP(C)/7228/2025 · 2025-12-16

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010272792025 2025:GAU-AS:17530 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7228/2025 FARUK AHMED CHOUDHURY S/O ABDULLA CHOUDHURY, VILL- AND P.O- NORTH NARAINPUR PART- II, DIST. HAILAKANDI,ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS. TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, CMD BSNL, DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, BHARAT SANCHAR BHAWAN, HARISH CHANDRA MATHUR LANE, JANAPATH, BSNL CO, NEW DELHI-110001. 2:THE PRINCIPAL GENERAL MANAGER GUWAHATI BA CORE NETWORK TX-NER 7TH FLOOR BSNL BHAWAN PANBAZAR GUWAHATI- 01 3:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER PROJECT CORE NETWORK TX- NER 6TH FLOOR BSNL BHAWAN PANBAZAR GUWAHATI- 01. 4:THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER (TP) CORE NETWORK TRANSMISSION NORTH EAST REGION BSNL SILCHAR WIDEBAND BUILDING 1ST FLOOR DRDA ROAD Page No.# 2/3 SILCHAR- 788001 5:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWRD SILCHAR UDHARBOND TERRITORIAL ROAD DIVISION. P.O- SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR PIN-788001. 6:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CACHAR SILCHAR CUM NODAL OFFICERROW P.O DIST- CACHAR PIN- 788001. 7:THE BRANCH MANAGER SBI PARK ROAD SILCHAR P.O- SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR PIN- 788001 8:THE GENERAL MANAGER T/P PMU- SILCHAR NHIDCL PESKAR LANE SONAI ROAD KANAKPUR PT-I P.OSILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR PIN- 78800 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Y.S. Mannan, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : None appears BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Page No.# 3/3 Date : 17.12.2025 Mr. Y.S. Mannan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that there are formal defects while arraying the parties in the instant proceedings. He therefore submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition with a liberty to re-file the same after removing those formal defects. 2. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. 3. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to file a fresh petition after removing the formal defects. JUDGE Comparing Assistant