Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26143 (AP)

M. Rangaswamy, v. Prl.Secy., Housing dept., State of A.P.,

WP/17318/2018 · 2025-04-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010358772018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17138/2018 Between: K.suresh and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND State Of A P and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M V RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY R 2. GP FOR HOUSING (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17138 of 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an appropriate Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action the 2nd Respondent in issuing revised instructions in RC.No. A5/1205/OSWI/2018 dated 14.04.2018 disqualifying the petitioners for the post of Gruha Mitra and the consequential Procs.No.05/2017/SB dated 27.04.2018 of the 5th respondent in dispensing with the services of the petitioners as illegal arbitrary and in violation of Art. 14 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondent to continue the petitioners in service with all consequential benefits and pass…” 2. Heard Sri M.V.Rama Rao, learned Counsel for the Petitioners and Sri R.Kalyan Chakravarthy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 3. It is represented by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not working in the organization and cause does not survive in this Writ petition. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed, since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 07.04.2025 UPS 3 20 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.17138 of 2018 Dated.07.04.2025 UPS