[2025:RJ-JP:29875] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11731/2025 1. Puranmal Kusum S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Village Malipura, Bundi, District Bundi (Rajasthan). 2. Praveen Kumar Mahavar S/o Shri Bheroolal Mahavar, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Mataji Ka Khejda, Kolipada, Ladpura, Kota City, Kota (Raj.) 3. Mohammad Nadeem Ansari S/o Shri Nizamuddin Ansari, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Near Mazid, Garampura, Lakheri, Bundi, District Bundi (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur-302004 (Raj.) 3. The District Collector, Bundi, District Bundi (Raj.) 4. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bundi, Distt. Bundi (Raj.) 5. The Block Chief Medical Officer, Kaleda, Distt. Bundi (Raj.) 6. The Senior Medical Officer Incharge, Chc Kaleda, Distt. Bundi (Raj.) 7. The Medical Officer Incharge, Chc Dahi Kheda, Distt. Bundi (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 05/08/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:29875] (2 of 3) [CW-11731/2025] Although, it is prayed in the writ petition that the orders impugned dated 21.01.2025, 15.05.2025 & 21.05.2025 dispensing with services of the petitioners, the pharmacists appointed on urgent temporary basis, be quashed and set aside; but, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he would feel contended if they are permitted to submit representation(s) with the respondents to consider their case in the light of an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 27.05.2025 passed in the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.11074/2025. In the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. (supra), this Court observed as under:- “Be that as it may, the petitioners may file their representation(s) with the concerned Chief Medical and Health Officers for redressal of their grievances. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to consider engagement/continuous of the petitioners on the post of Pharmacist, in case they feel that the services of the petitioners are required by them. The present writ petitions stand disposed of, accordingly. The stay applications also stand disposed of, accordingly.” Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 02.02.2024 passed in the case of Pawan Meena versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil [2025:RJ-JP:29875] (3 of 3) [CW-11731/2025] Writ Petition No.1665/2024, this writ petition is disposed of in following terms without issuing notices to the respondents:- 1. The petitioners are at liberty to submit representation(s) with the respondents for redressal of their grievance(s) within a period of four weeks from today. 2. The respondents are directed to consider the representation(s) within a period of twelve weeks from the date of its receipt in the light of observation made by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. (supra). Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/10