Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26141 (AP)

SMT VYKUNTA PADMA SREE v. JETTI LAKSHMI

CRP/1990/2025 · 2025-09-14

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010369402025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1990/2025 BETWEEN: 1. SMT VYKUNTA PADMA SREE, W/o. VAIKUNTA VEERANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, HINDU HOME MAKER, R/o. DOOR No. 44, M.MUPPALLA VILLAGE, NAGULUPPALAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASHAM DIST ...PETITIONER AND 1. JETTI LAKSHMI, W/o. SRINIVASA RAO AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, HINDU, HOUSEWIFE, M.MUPPALLA VILLAGE, NG PADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DIST. 2. ELECTION OFFICER FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT ELECTIONS, AT MUPPALLA GRAMPANCHAYAT, BY NAME PUTCHAKAYALA PRASAD STAGE-LL, S/o. KRISHNA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, HINDU, HEADMASTER IN PATIBANDIA, SRIMANNARAYANA CHOWDARY COMMITTEE HIGH SCHOOL, MUPPAVARAM VILLAGE, J.PANGULURU MANDAL, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, PRAKASHM DISTRICT, PRAKASAM BHAVAN, ONGOLE. 4. MANDAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, NG PADU MANDAL, STAGE - II, MANDAL ELECTION OFFICER, GRAMA PANCHAYAT ELECTIONS, NG PADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, AP 5. THE COLLECTOR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, THE DISTRICT ELECTION AUTHORITY, FOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT ELECTIONS, APPOINTED BY AP STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, AP. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the petitioner begs to present the above revision aggrieved by the order dated 14.07.2025 in I.A.No526 of 2025 in Election OP No1 of 2021 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge at Ongole, for the following grounds amongst others. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V A PADMANABHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SUDHAKARA RAO AMBATI The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that pending disposal of the Revision Petition, the Election Tribunal has delivered its Judgment. Hence, the present Civil Revision Petition rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 15.09.2025 Harin 4 123 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1990 OF 2025 Date: 15-09-2025 Harin