APHC010005652025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 357/2025 Between: 1. RONGALI GIREESHA, D/O ESWARARAO AGED 24 YEARS OCC. UNEMPLOYED R/O H.NO.1-15, CHANDULURU VTC LAKKAVARAPUKOTA VIZIANAGARAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR, SAMAGRA SHIKSHA KBC BOYS HIGH SCHOOL PREMISES OPP RYTHU BAZAR PATAMATA VIJAYAWADA ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT VIJAYAWADA AMARAVATHI ANDHRA PRADESH 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN, SAMAGRA SHIKSHA VIZIANAGARAM VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VIZIANAGARAM VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT 6. THE ADDITIONAL PROJECT CO ORDINATOR, SAMAGRA SHIKSHA 2 VIZIANAGARAM VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents not consider petitioner candidature to appoint as CRT (English) since the candidate at Sr.No.1 in merit list given unwillingness for the said post vide Recruitment Notification N0.01/KGBV/APSS/2024, dated 23.09.2024 and deny to appoint the petitioner as CRT (English) is illegal arbitrary unjust and violative of Art 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to appoint petitioner as CRT (English) and continued her service until completion of their contract agreement for the ensuring academic year and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to appoint petitioner as CRT (English) pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAMARTHY RATHNAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. REVANURU SUDHA RANI (SC FOR SAMAGRA SHIKSHA) 2. GP FOR SERVICES III The Court made the following: ::ORDER:: Heard Sri P.Rathnakar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt R.Sudha Rani, learned Standing counsel for respondents 2 to 6. 2. The above writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondents in not considering the candidature of petitioner to appoint her as CRT (English), 3 in pursuance of the Recruitment Notification No.01/KGBV/APSS/2024, dated 23.09.2024, as illegal and arbitrary. 3. At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel submitted instructions of 5th respondent. The proceedings issued by the State Project Director, Samagra Shiksha-2nd respondent vide Memo No.SS-21021/44/2024-IED & KGBV-SSA, dated 06.01.2025 granting permission to fill up remaining notified vacancies with the next meritorious candidates. In the written instructions it was mentioned that the name of the petitioner will be considered in the available vacancies. 4. Learned counsel would submit that in view of the subsequent developments taking place in the present writ petition, no orders are required. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated: 08.01.2025 SNI 4 333 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.357 of 2025 Dated 07.01.2025 SNI