Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010369342025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Si MONDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY iS TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE Q PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18863 OF 2025 Between:
1. S.Syed Tanveer,, S/o. Syed Vazed Sab, Aged about 34 years, Occ Stone Business, R/o. kyathagondanahalli post, Medigeshi Hobali, Madhugiri Taluk, Thumukur District, Karnataka State. 2. Lakshmi Narayana,, S/o. Late Chinna Pennayya, Aged about 39 Occ Worker at Shop Anantapur, Anantapur District years, Madakasira, R/o.D.No.4/257, Penugonda road. ...PETITIONERS AND
1. The State of A P, Rep, by it's Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat Building, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.4k. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Puttaparthi, Sri Satya Sai District. 3. The Circle Inspector, Urban Police Station, Madakasira District. Sri Satya Sai
4. G Narasegoud, s/o. Kenchappa Aged about 53 years, R/o.Kataguntanahalli Village, Medigeshi Hobali, Madhugiri Taluk, Thumukur District, Karnataka State. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent - Circle Inspector of Police, Madakasira, Sri Satya Sai District - in summoning and harassing the petitioners without any complaint, FIR, or due process of law, and at the instance of the 4th respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to interfere in any manner with the personal liberty and civil rights of the petitioners, and not to summon or harass the petitioners in connection with the sale transaction covered under Sale Deed No. 1076 of 2017, dt 02-06-2017. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent - Circle Inspector of Police, Madakasira, Sri Satya Sai District - not to summon, harass, or take any coercive action against the petitioners in connection with the sale transaction covered under Sale Deed No. 1076 of 2017, dt;02-06-2017, and not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioners, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER :
: SREEMANNARAYANA VATTIKUTI
1
"• APHC010369342025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18863/2025 Between:
1.S.SYED TANVEER,, S/0. SYED VAZED SAB, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC STONE BUSINESS, R/0. KYATHAGONDANAHALLI POST, MEDIGESHI HOBALI, MADHUGIRI TALUK, THUMUKUR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE. 2.LAKSHMI NARAYANA,, S/0. LATE CHINNA PENNAYYA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC WORKER AT SHOP, R/O.D.NO.4/257, PENUGONDA ROAD, MADAKASIRA, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF A P, REP, BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.4K. VELAGAPUDI 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE. PUTTAPARTHI, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 3.THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, URBAN POLICE STATION, MADAKASIRA SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 4.G NARASEGOUD, S/0. KENCHAPPA, R/O.KATAGUNTANAHALLI VILLAGE, MADHUGIRI TALUK, THUMUKUR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, MEDIGESHI HOBALI, ...RESPONDENT{S);
2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent-Circle Inspector of Police, Madakasira, Sri Satya Sai District - in summoning and harassing the petitioners without any complaint, FIR, or due process of law, and at the instance of the 4th respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to interfere in any manner with the personal liberty and civil rights of the petitioners, and not to summon or harass the petitioners in connection with the sale transaction covered under Sale Deed No. 1076 of 2017, dt 02-06-2017, lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent - Circle Inspector of Police, Madakasira, Sri Satya Sai District - not to summon, harass, or take any coercive action against the petitioners in connection with the sale transaction covered under Sale Deed No. 1076 of 2017, dt:02-06-2017, and not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioners, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1 .SREEMANNARAYANA VATTIKUTI Counsel for the Respondent{S):
1.GP FOR HOME
3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA WRIT PETITION NO: 18863/2025 JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for; ...pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent-circle Inspector of Police, Madakasira, Sri Satya Sai District - in summoning and harassing the petitioners without any complaint, FIR, or due process of law, and at the Instance of the 4th respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14 Constitution of India, and consequently direct the not to interfere in any manner with the of the petitioners, and not to one 3rd and 21 of the respondents 2 and 3 personal liberty and civil rights summon or harass the petitioners In connection with the sale transaction covered under Sale Deed 1076 of 2017, dt 02-06-2017...” No.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on instructions, would submit that no complaint or FIR has been registered against the petitioners at Madakasira matter involved in the present petition is of civil in nature involving a sale transaction and no criminal aspect is involved. As such, they are not interfering in the matter. Police Station. He would further submit that the
3. Sri Sreemannarayana Vattikuti, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of.
4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Police are directed to follow the due process of law. No order as to costs.
4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- A.VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SE' OFFICER To,
1. The Principal Secretary State of A P Building, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.4k.
2. The Superintendent of Police, Puttaparthi, Sri Satya Sai District.
3. The Circle Inspector, Urban Police Station, District. Home Department, Secretariat Madakasira Sri Satya Sai
4. G Narasegoud, s/o. Kenchappa, R/o.Kataguntanahalli Village, Medigeshi Hobali, Madhugiri District, Karnataka State. Aged about 53 years. Taluk, Thumukur
5. One CC to SRI. SREEMANNARAYANA VATTIKUTI
6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME High Court of Andhra
7. Two CD Copies Advocate [OPUC] Pradesh [OUT] TAC
HIGH COURT DATED:28/07/2025
ORDER WP NO. 18863 OF 2025 g( 2 8 JUL 2025 ViNOiggnt SectioQX^y DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS