Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26136 (JHR)

KISHORI ALIAS KISHORE KUMAR SINGH ALIAS KISHOR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8575/2024 · 2025-08-18

Rajesh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:24028 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 8575 of 2024 .... Kishori @ Kishore Kumar Singh @ Kishor Singh, aged about 73 years, S/o-late Lal Govind Singh, R/o-Village-Tanapur, P.O. & P.S.-Karon, Sub-Madhupur, District- Deoghar, Jharkhand .… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party .... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Kashyap, Sr. Adv. : Ms. Supriya Dayal, Adv. For the State : Mr. B.N.Ojha, Spl. P.P. For the Informant : Mr. K.S. Nanda, Adv. .... 17/18.08.2025 1. The applicant who is in custody since 04.09.2023 has renewed the prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. No.514 of 2023 arising out of Karon P.S. Case No.37 of 2023, registered for the offence under Section 304B/34 of IPC, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Madhupur. The charge has been framed on 19.04.2024 under Sections 302/34 and 304B/34 of IPC. 2. It has been submitted by learned senior counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part. 3. Earlier the bail application of this applicant was rejected on merit vide order dated 12.02.2024 passed in B.A. No.11641 of 2023. This is the second attempt. Prayer for bail of the applicant has been renewed stating that charge has been framed and out of 13 charge sheeted witnesses, only 03 witnesses have been examined. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been renewed. 4. Learned Spl. P.P. and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant. 5. Considering the nature of crime, I am not inclined to reconsider the prayer for bail of the applicant. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the applicant stands rejected once again. 6. However, the court below is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within six months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order. 2025:JHHC:24028 2 B. A. No. 8575 of 2024 7. The applicant is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail, if the trial is not concluded within six months. 8. Office is directed to remit back the trial court record after retaining photo copy. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Shahid/ uploaded