Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010370202019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 17714/2019
Between:
1. M.JANARDHAN RAO, S/O. SIMHACHALAM, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC- COMPUTER OPERATOR, IN G.
MADUGULA DWAMA DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY (EGS) VISAKHAPATNAM,
R/O.D.NO. 20/211/5/2, KOTHAPALEM,
SURYANAGAR, GOPALAPATNAM (RURAL)
GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. A.P. 530 027. ...PETITIONER AND
1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT., CENTRAL SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P.
4. THE MEMBER SECRETARY, SOCIETY FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICE, (S.R.D.S.), OFFICE OF CRD, AP, VIJAYAWADA. 5. THE PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, G.
MADUGULA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR FAC AND JOINT SECRETARY, (SRDS) DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to set aside the impugned order vide Rc. No.218/2015/B4/DVC dated 30-6-2015 issued by the 6th respondent holding the same as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, unconstitutional and it amounts to violation of Articles 14, 16, 21 of Constitution of India, and principles of natural justice and direct the respondents to reinstate the applicant into service with all consequential benefits in the interest of justice and to pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent consider the representation dated 3-06-2019 dispose the same pending disposal of the WP and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P LAKSHMANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY)
2. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 17714 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 24.07.2025, to list the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is no representation on either side. 2.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 14.08.2025 PSA
4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 17714 of 2019
Date: 14.08.2025 PSA